May 4th, 2004


something not to do in a query

I owe Tempest some notes on queries for her site For Writers. I keep wanting to take time out to do it. But it's actually a lot harder to come up with all the good ways to do queries than point out all the bad things I've seen in queries. Still, I have every intention of finishing it for her. Just as soon as I review these three contracts, read the backlogged pile of submissions (oh, those go way too far back *cringe*), answer the current 60-odd emails (oh, one of those is from Tempest *wry look*) currently in my work email account, and get this intimidating pile of manuscripts back out to market. However, I did get an email query in over the weekend that was just stunning, so I'm going to take a moment to be publicly amazed about it. Heh.

I know this was an odd thing to do, but I took the cc field and copied it out to Excel on the off-chance it would put each person on their own line. It worked. So, I now know that this person simultaneously queried 468 agents. Wow. I knew it was a lot, but that is just amazing. I suppose it's really too bad that they didn't bcc it. Just about every agent I know is alright with simultaneous queries (though some of them prefer exclusivity for material submissions). Still, one likes to think that one is part of a select group - chosen with care - targeted as desirable. To be part of a 468-agent query is, well, insulting. At least, I think so. Let's just skip the fact that my website says I prefer not to receive email queries in the first place. And the fact that this was a ranty *non-fiction* concept. It's clear this person didn't do any research or they would have known that I specialize in fiction and can count on one hand the number of non-fiction books I've sold (it could change, but it won't for this book). But, given the number of agents they queried (some of which I don't believe are accepting new clients, and a few of which have either left the biz or jumped the fence into the editorial pool), I won't take it personally. I wonder if they'll be so lucky with everyone else. My instinct is to say that they just burned the publishing bridge to the ground and then tossed explosives after it into the gorge. And I'm really curious to know how they could possibly have thought that spamming such a large portion of the agent community (which really isn't all that big and occasionally has the opportunity to talk to each other) was even vaguely a good idea.

Well, anyway - rant over. I guess I'd better get back to work. I've got a jug of suntea brewing and there's actual sun. *g* And I really need to get started on moving all this paper out of my office....
  • Current Music
    Petracovich - Blue Cotton Skin